Farhan Classic Flat For Sale, Chapman High School Website, City Of Novi Building Department, 1395 Lexington Ave, New York, Ny 10128, Articles E

One example is when I am tentatively removing something that I think there's a high probability will have to be re-added in the near future, in some form. -1 Commented code is very useful for understanding the intent of a function. #1027, To conform with PEP 681, attr.s() and attrs.define() now accept unsafe_hash in addition to hash. Errors occurred with encoding hints that valid with PEP 263 #3 - GitHub We just haven't set it up that way yet. Usually you have to check out an old version or diff against an old version, you just see two versions, and there's no good concise view of what changed that can give you an at-a-glance idea of what changed. But what do you do when you need to ship experimental code because you are trying to identify the root cause of a site's problem? Is commented out code really always bad? [duplicate] Closed 9 years ago. The problem though in this scenario is that we will not release from a private branch and he wants a partial solution deployed. Many places won't pay to back up individual developers' boxes. @camh: An issue tracking system won't provide the same context as a reminder that is in the code itself, in context, with a succinct comment in place about the problem. I can draft a PR based on what you want to do, either: Using flake8-eradicate==1.2.1 I will close the issue. Done! I do Repositories are backup of code. "Pure Copyleft" Software Licenses? Flake8 Eradicate. to your account. E800 shouldn't be triggered for # noqa lines #1457 - GitHub Anyone is allowed to delete the commented code if it's been around for a full week and never been active. Rex M said: 1) Only check in complete functionality, 2) [If] the task is too large - break it into smaller completable tasks. Code 534 Do not honor, high fraud: The transaction failed PayPal or Google Checkout risk modeling. Commented code should raise an error. flake8-eradicate==1.2.1 I absolutely agree that commented out code shouldn't be checked into the repository, that is what source code control is for. I think "Never" is too strong a rule. [EDIT] To toggle // comments on code: In the C/C++ editor, select the line(s) of code that you want to comment out. Maybe unlike everyone else, I have to work on multiple projects with multiple interruptions with the "real world" ocassionally interrupted my workday. Already on GitHub? I try to modify the behavior to follow PEP 263 with PyCQA/eradicate#9 for now. typing.Literal. There is nothing wrong with checking in commented out code in some situations, it's just that this is one situation where there may be a better way to do it, so the developer can track changes to his source even though it isn't ready to be checked in to the main repository. An example I've seen is where something was broken because the code set an soTIMEOUT. In my case, it's not Markdown but an example TOML config as a part of the docstring: https://github.com/ansible/pylibssh/blob/devel/bin/pep517_backend/_backend.py#L79. The only reason I would comment it out is because I would not want to break the overnight build. Issue with noqa comment & commented out code w/ flake8-eradicate, Issue with flake8-noqa, flake8-eradicate and commented out code. It is actually a Java centric app but there is a plugin that can handle C# code. PyPI. I have also seen that it helps to wait until you get the unsolicited modem response "Call Ready". I don't disagree with the concept but for now we use shelving in TFS instead. to your account. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Commented-out code is a source code that has been excluded or disabled from execution by adding special characters. New! This is quite important for the project in a long run. Code where comments are out of sync is broken. Hello. It could possibly be useful during refactoring. You have a subtle bug that might be reintroduced if the incorrect code isn't left in as a reminder. flake8==5.0.4 Sign in The idea of allowing source-control history to illustrate the "old way" of doing something rather than commenting it out and checking in the commenting-out along with an explanation is a good idea in theory. #1065. It's not a concept I disagree with. Code 596 Suspected fraud: Again, the card issuer suspects fraud and has blocked the transaction. From the whole source code the context of each line can be determined. False Positives | Markdown in block strings #215 - GitHub I know that my team does not do as good of a job as it should of checking in as soon as there is something solid and ready to go. Later, someone that is working near there can just delete the commented out code as it has been proven not to be needed. causes E800: Found commented out code and it's wrong. All of these potential scenarios (and ones I haven't mentioned here) are wasted time and effort. Hello the following code is now getting flagged as E800 Found commented out code This has only just started getting flagged with the upgrade from 1.0.0 -> 1.1.0 Example code: MARKDOWN = """ # {variable_containing_header_one} Lots of cont. @John: Absolutely agree. This is quite important for the project in a long run. +1: Leaving the commented-out code in place -- if and only if it is concise and inobtrusive -- prevents someone from forgetting "don't do this" and reintroducing the bug. Bad examples of comments include: Out-commented code; Todo items; Visual markers that split the code into sections; Comments that duplicate code; One of the only useful situations in which code comments are useful is sharing domain knowledge. Edit: :-). not feel any need to justify Checking in of "commented out" code - Stack Overflow I have no problem with checking in half finished code (so you get the benefit of source control) that isn't called by the live system. Note: approximate conversions between ICD-9-CM codes and ICD-10-CM codes may require clinical interpretation in order to determine the most appropriate conversion . This is especially useful for those who aren't fans of attrs's behavior of stripping underscores from private attribute names. My question for you is why not? That's a slippery slope to a very ropey code base. Both eradicate and flake8-eradicate are fine with both examples. I can't always afford to "finish" a task, no matter how small. If it happens that the commenting blocks lines are not merge properly, presto your code will become active in the system when it shouldn't be. The ultimate goal should be coder productivity, not "a pristine repository.". And yes I do check them in. Not always, but not. Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. We want to eventually get to a point where we are taking full advantage of Continuous Integration and automatically deploying to a development web server. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Seems to be somehow related to the colons after Project/Created, if I remove them the errors disappear. If you're in the unfortunate situation of having to deal with Black formatting, then this plugin catches the on/off markers as if they were code. Make a patch release bumping flake8-eradicate? Blender Geometry Nodes, Story: AI-proof communication by playing music, Effect of temperature on Forcefield parameters in classical molecular dynamics simulations, Continuous Variant of the Chinese Remainder Theorem. I would certainly discourage, strongly, ever checking in commented-out code. to your account. My source control tree on my current project is about 10 weeks old, on a team of only about 4 engineers, and there are about 200 committed change lists. In my experience when a programmer checks in commented out code, it is because he/she is not sure what the right solution is and is happier leaving the alternate solution in the source in the hope that someone else will make that decision. If we did then I'd say do what you want with your private branch but don't ever merge commented out code with the trunk or any shared branches. Based on eradicate project. Update frequency (including time of day and day of week), Pull request limits (per update run and/or open at any time), Automerge options (never/patch/minor, and dev/runtime dependencies), Out-of-range updates (receive only lockfile updates, if desired), Security updates (receive only security updates, if desired), State an ignore might be needed for optional B9x checks. To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation. If the first and second conflict (e.g. if is comment character, continue. #987, Fix slight performance regression in classes with custom __setattr__ and speedup even more. When do I check in commented-out code? If I have to fix something, and I can fix it in a few hours, I'm not likely to spend an hour investigating old versions of the code that haven't been "live" in a month (which, with each developer checking in often, means back many revisions), unless I happen to know that there's something in there (such as if I remember a discussion about changing something related to what I'm doing now). Okay, I don't know anything about TFS, so maybe there are good reasons. I confirmed that when I tried to re-add flake8-eradicate>=1.0.0, it started throwing errors at me again. I created the same issue in flake8-noqa repository but its author pointed out that the issue could be in your package. Period. Why Commented Out Code Is a Terrible Idea (Let's Fix It) - MethodPoet @John Saunders: This depends on what checking in does in your source control system. Check in often - at least once, but preferably many times per day. If your colleague's change isn't in a state where it can be checked in, he needs to finish it, and/or learn to make smaller, incremental changes. to your account, Hello the following code is now getting flagged as E800 Found commented out code flake8 plugin to find commented out (or so called "dead") code. https://github.com/myint/eradicate/blob/a7c2fcbaaa24a1cc0773babd88340a7a221a5971/eradicate.py#L57, Flake8 doesn't support noqa on a separate line. I'm using pre-commit.com too and I have an upstream flake8 hook set up. Major update in 2.0.0 We automatically encourage avoiding escaping quotes as per PEP 8. It wont take long before that commented code is out of context, no longer tested, linted, or run, the APIs it was using have changed or been removed, and now it's just in the way. I know I could look at the diff logs to see what's changed but it's a pain - it's nice to see the last changes right there in the code. Edit: After reading the other answers and comments, I'll add that I don't think it's necessarily a good idea to ban commented code (not sure how you'd enforce that anyway). flake8-noqa==1.2.5. A useless-looking piece of code that has an important meaning should be clarified with a concise comment. Otherwise, just let the VCS be your archive and code distributor. But I often find myself leaving commented . test-project). It's relatively easy to develop a policy that meets the needs of both camps rather than exclude one or the other. Quick and easy way to remove "dead" (commented out) code In a perfect world everyone leaves great comments for this. It doesn't prevent the oversight. +1. If you have more than a few developers, the latter is going to take increasing precedence, because you can't have one developer crapping all over everyone else for his own personal workflow. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and IDE backups don't protect against data loss. @Rex M: IMO, Comments are an essential part of the code. However, sometimes (if not often) code is the better comment. I'd rather see a concise block comment (a few lines tops) that mentions the reasons for taking one approach vs another. @rzijp, Adam Hill (@adamghill), Dan Groshev (@si14), Tamir Bahar (@tmr232), Adi Roiban (@adiroiban), Magnus Watn (@magnuswatn), David Cramer (@dcramer), Moving Content AG (@moving-content), Stein Magnus Jodal (@jodal), Iwan Aucamp (@aucampia), ProteinQure (@ProteinQure), Jesse Snyder (@jessesnyder), Rivo Laks (@rivol), Thomas Ballinger (@thomasballinger), @medecau, Ionel Cristian Mrie (@ionelmc), The Westervelt Company (@westerveltco), Philippe Galvan (@PhilippeGalvan), Birk Jernstrm (@birkjernstrom), Jannis Leidel (@jezdez), Tim Schilling (@tim-schilling), Chris Withers (@cjw296), and Christopher Dignam (@chdsbd). E-mail transmission error codes and recommendations Merely tha, Flake8 meet isort Use isort to check if the imports on your python files are sorted the way you expect. Emacs (and most IDE's) have no mechanism to save that. We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously. Latest version published 25 days ago. I wish I could up vote you more than once. code.py # a = 5 a = 7 flake8 run A repository is a version control system not a backup tool in my mind. ICD-9-CM E800.0 converts approximately to: 2023 ICD-10-CM V81.2XXA Occupant of railway train or railway vehicle injured in collision with or hit by rolling stock, initial encounter. That seemed to work fine in local envs of developers under different OSs. You signed in with another tab or window. A comment like the above is appropriate if you are delivering a hotfix to stop a customer's bleeding and you don't have the immediate opportunity to find the ultimate fix. It probably doesn't break anything that already works. I'd charactarize the latter as "those who like to use their revision control system as a poor-man's tape backup", but that would be tipping my hand as to which camp I'm in. Looking at something very slightly inconvenient and immediately assuming it was added just to piss you off shows a very self-important attitude on your part. Mostly in agreement. ABAP Know How: 3 lines of code, 2 commented out | SAP Blogs - SAP Community #995, attrs.has() is now a TypeGuard for AttrsInstance. The next developer to see that commented-out code would have no idea that it's a work in progress. Commenting out code - IBM This is complex stuff and should preferably be fixed by changing antenna matching (e.g. I've done some googling and haven't found any mentions of using noqa on the previous line. I'm using flake8, flake8-noqa & flake8-eradicate. But in GitHub Actions CI/CD something shady started happening, something quite unobvious and hard to debug. You are correct. Already on GitHub? @Robert just because it happens a lot doesn't mean we shouldn't try to avoid it. But not afterward.". QA generally test what should be there, they don't test for code that is not supposed to be there, so your code may end up in production before you know it, and by the time it would be realized the code is there when it shouldn't, the cost in maintenance have multiplied many folds (as the "bug" will be discovered in production or by the customer, worst place or time ever). I disagree. If the code is incomplete, why is it being checked-in in the first place. Issue with noqa comment & commented out code w/ flake8-eradicate EDIT: when eradicate 2.0.0 is released I will update the dependency and finish this PR. ESPECIALLY when the fix involves removing lines of code, not rewriting lines of code. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Well occasionally send you account related emails. All of those things are risks to developer's time. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: It would be hard to fix, since that's how eradicate works . Have a question about this project? You signed in with another tab or window. to put them on the previous line. 1 same thing happens if project is changed to a single word (e.g. If no lines are selected comments will be added (or removed) at the current cursor position. Thank you to all of you making sustainable maintenance possible! @John: It sounds like that defect was caused by a developer oversight. flake8-eradicate==1.4.0 How to find the end point in a mesh line. PyCQA/eradicate#9 already merged and included at eradicate 1.0. However, you won't ever win the argument. The burden is on you to sell it effectively. Production code with no FIXMEs? For example, "The following code does more harm than good, so is commented out, but needs to be replaced before release XXX.". With certain source code control system and certain language, the diff/merge tool can be easily confused. As a result, source control is a frictonless team-member, one that helps us get our job done. Definitely on the removing lines of code. Is there a method for differentiating informative comments from It's been a lot busier than the changelog indicates, but a lot of the work happened under the hood (like some impressive performance improvements). If I am working on code but it is not completed, why not comment it out and check it in at the end of the day. Seems to be somehow related to the colons after Project/Created, if I remove them the errors disappear. Search. Does this happen with raw eradicate? I agree with your clarification--never check-in half-finishe code into the "trunk" or whatever that equivalent is. Sometimes noqa comments. To me, this would be analogous to saying "I always flush before using the toilet. Gendarme errors. #991, You can expect an improvement of about 5% -- even for very simple classes. To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation. @null - as mentioned in the edit, I have no problem with them, we just haven't done it yet.