Stohlquist Keeper Pfd, Splatoon 3 Synergy Bonus, Hunt Club Farm Military Discount, Hyperion Daylily For Sale, Articles W

A visiting scholar of philosophy at Talbot School of Theology and professor at Houston Baptist University, Craig is a noted Christian apologist who heads the group Reasonable Faith. He is a deep critic of metaphysical naturalism. Sam Harris, the popular American author and philosopher, once described William as the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheists.. This is a textbook example of moving the goalposts. The analogy in the end I show is inadequate. I would be opposed to what's been called Latin trinitarianism or sometimes called antisocial trinitarianism which sees the persons of the Trinity as not robust persons in the psychological sense but just as subsistent relations within the Godhead. from Is There Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus? This is of course tied to the "partisan problem" since it appears that some of Craig's fans are very diligent in monitoring his Wikipedia page. Decision cards are used by evangelists to join their church and/or nudge people into accepting Jesus as their savior. Arif Ahmed vs William Lane Craig Debate, William Lane Craig Misrepresents Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, Why I refuse to debate with William Lane Craig: This Christian 'philosopher' is an apologist for genocide. But it's not a competing scientific theory. No cause is needed.""[23]. [21]:187 This seems to present Craig with a major problem if relativity theory describes physical time only and says nothing about metaphysical time, then how can he infer that past metaphysical time is finite from a result about the finitude of past physical time? Richard Dawkins is wrong to call William Lane Craig morally repulsive Furthermore, if the universe is defined as the totality of existence, it could never have been caused as a whole, since that would entail that at one point existence was non-existent, which is simply incoherent. Craig said not essentially, not as a paraphrase, but literally, in quotable words "the death of these children was actually their salvation." Reasonable Faith features the work of philosopher and theologian Dr. William Lane Craig in order to carry out its three-fold mission: (1) to provide an articulate, intelligent voice for biblical Christianity in the public arena, (2) to challenge unbelievers with the truth of biblical Christianity, and (3) to train Christians to state . May Gods strength be evident in you! He has authored or edited over thirty books, including The Kalam Cosmological Argument; Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom; Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology; and God, Time, and Eternity, as well as nearly a hundred articles in professional journals of philosophy and theology, including The Journal of Philosophy, American Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy, and British Journal for Philosophy of Science. Infinite sets just defy logic. I don't think that is a robust enough notion of a person. Analytic philosopher and Christian theologian, apologist, and author, In Kilograms 73 Kg, In Pounds 161 lbs, In Centimetres 180.34cm, In Feet and Inches 5 11. So thats what I mean when I say he works with the cards that he's been dealt. This undermines all three of Craig's original premises for the Kalm cosmological argument. It is absurd to think that Peter van Inwagen here at the University of Notre Dame is psychopathic, or that a guy like Dr. Tom Flint, who is as gracious a Christian gentlemen as I could have ever met, is psychopathic. 2. We wish a healthy and happy life to him hereafter. [14] On his own website he has transcripts going back to 1991[15] and what is most remarkable is how many of them are verbatim recycling earlier scripts. Even some places on Earth cannot always support human life, e.g. He is one of the biggest figures in the case of spreading religion. William Lane Craig is Research Professor of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology and. Dr. William Lane Craig Explores the Headwaters of the Human Race This fifth and final "argument" is not an argument, and even Craig admits that: The problem is that this non-argument could be used by any believer to argue for the existence of a preferred deity or deities. A case in point is Craig's claim about the majority of New Testament scholars agreeing that Jesus' tomb was found empty after his crucifixion. Genesis as Mytho-History: A Critical Evaluation of William Lane Craig's Genre Analysis By James M. Rochford I can still remember the first time I heard of William Lane Craig. William Lane Craig vs. Dr. Rosenberg, William Lane Craig: Difference between revisions, https://archive.org/details/william-lane-craig-j.-p.-moreland-the-blackwell-companion-to-natural-theology/mode/2up, Statements that are wrong on the level of a Young Earth, List of gods that theists don't believe in, Responding to Sam Burke's Argument That Christianity Entails Anti-Natalism, Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures, Examples of God personally killing people, https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=William_Lane_Craig&oldid=2552277, Pages using DynamicPageList parser function, "The Big Show" is Craig's large buffet of arguments for God's/god's, "The Little Show" is simply an expansion on one of Craig's 5 arguments from "The Big Show", specifically his claim that. But I'm obviously not a Catholic. Atheist blogger Chris Hallquist, who has written extensively on Craig, has also compiled a list of Craig's misrepresentations. The Personal, Historical God Of Faith, #268 Circularity and Evidence for Jesus Resurrection, William Lane Craig and Sean Carroll | "God and Cosmology" | 2014 Greer Heard Forum. However, Craig's version is (as usual) even more convoluted: Craig cannot use the obvious eternity escape hatch, because he argues elsewhere that infinity is impossible in the physical world (as opposed to in mathematics). You still have an infinite number of guests. In his debate with Professor Sean Carroll of the California Institute of Technology,[91] Craig says the following just after the 1:18:00 mark: "he [Dr. Carroll] has to justify some non-standard measure of probability" This statement is pure gibberish, which Craig has never attempted to justify, let alone quantify. Be grateful for what earthly goods you do have. I was about to explain how I have a very different view of justification than Roman Catholics do, but I bit my tongue at that point and thought there's no need to alienate the Roman Catholics here in the audience. Indeed, promoting the Kalm and attempting to use it as proof for the existence of God is what Craig is best known for. Craig has worked as the President of several philosophical societies like the Evangelical Philosophical Society, Philosophy of Time Society etc. So it is meaningless to state that they have a cause because they begin to exist. Prior to his appointmant at Talbot he spent seven years at the Higher Institute of Philosophy of the Katholike Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. It offers no clear distinctions for when a "divine dispensation" applies (or even how we can be sure that Craig's God and holy book are presenting us with the correct divine get-out-of-jail-free card), a problem exacerbated when religious texts contain a host of conflicting, arbitrary, or excessively specific rules. So, Craig claims to prove the existence of God by invoking the resurrection of Jesus, which is itself explained by presuming that God exists to supernaturally resurrect Jesus. In quantum mechanics, things happen that are not caused, such as radioactive decay, or when an atom in an excited energy level loses a photon. For example, he praises Bart Ehrman for a minor shift in opinion that he made years before the debate date, and he is thus able to convince the audience that the morally and scientifically proper thing for Ehrman to do is to continue to shift towards Craig's position. Until then we must, like Paul, struggle though by faith. [7] Craig himself described the object of his Ph.D. research as being to "develop a cosmological argument for God's existence". William Lane Craig - Facebook In Atonement and the Death of Christ William Lane Craig defends a classical Reformed understanding of the atonement. Thomas Aquinas used the exact same line of "reasoning", stating in his Summa Theologica that, "With regard to heretics two points must be observed: one, on their own side; the other, on the side of the Church. In the other nature he's strong, capable, mighty, and so forth. Life, the Universe, and Nothing (I): Has Science Buried God? Apologist William Craig 'totally normal' after hospitalization | U.S. News William Lane Craig: An Exchange with Ken Ham - Peaceful Science And to say that God plays with the cards he's been dealt is a metaphorical way of saying God doesn't determine that that if you were to eat at Longhorn you'd order the mushroom burger. He is able to misrepresent his opponent's views before his opponent has had the chance to present them himself. Here William Lane Craig combines thorough research and judicious weighing of the arguments to show that the biblical picture of human origins, rightly understood, can match very well with the best results of the sciencesagain, rightly understood. For instance, Vilenkin subscribes to multiverse theory, which Craig is himself critical of. He thus posits that (micro)evolution happened, but that the genetic bottleneck in human genetic history was just two people and then reverts to ID talking points.[66]. A theology blog offers three things about Dr. Craig. Furthermore, Craig claims that his personal experience with his god trumps any countervailing argument or evidence he may encounter, as demonstrated in Craig's two quotes from the lead of this article about the superiority of the "witness of the Holy Spirit" to any conclusion reached by reason. Comprehensive company profiles. As long as God approves it, its acceptable to systematically wipe out entire races, including babies and children. DR. CRAIG: I had to smile when I read that. Help keep The Christian Post free for everyone by making a one-time donation today. DR. CRAIG: Yeah, I really was because the purpose of that dialogue was to emphasize our points of commonality, and then all of a sudden he says this to me Why aren't you a Catholic? William gets a salary of 97k dollars just from his university as a professor. Anything we have is a gift from Him. Under the set of real numbers, there are an infinite number of solutions, that is, values of 'x' and 'y' that will make the equation true. Knowledge about a 1-1 correspondence is required to grasp the concept of infinity. Though I think hermeneutically it's a real option. Kristof: Merry Christmas, Dr. Craig! William Lane Craig is Visiting Scholar of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology and Professor of Philosophy at Houston Christian University. That's not the forum. In Christ we have eternal life, redemption from our sins, and a relation to God, an incommensurable good. Think of all those who are! And yet it is the same person. Uh, this is simply, uh, below the belt. He disses New Atheist authors such as Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris as: While Craig likes to boast that he is a "professional philosopher" and that he engages in "academic" debates which concentrate on the arguments, not on personalities, Craig has also stated that while Dawkins may be a good scientist, he is a "layman" in philosophy and theology and The God Delusion is a "very unsophisticated book. Is William Lane Craig Incompetent or Dishonest? - Reddit ", Birmingham University, October 2011, https://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0110/0110012v2.pdf, #336 Honesty, Transparency, Full Disclosure and the Borde-Guth-Vilenkin Theorem, The Caused Beginning of the Universe: A Response to Quentin Smith, Is Faith in God Reasonable? SURCREHOL Company Profile | ROUBAIX, HAUTS DE FRANCE, France How can we be bitter? "[19] Clearly, Vilenkin does not reject all beginning-less models of the universe, as Wetterich's paper has received many citations,[20], Borde-Guth-Vilenkin's claim and Craig's views on time do not appear to go hand in hand. This is a new "argument" from Craig, which he elaborated upon in a radio debate with atheist British philosopher Daniel Came on 10 January 2015. In the course of trying to make Christianity easier to believe for people, he can almost leave it or, at the very least fail to provide, a doctrinally deep picture of the religion. Craig not only appeals to emotions when trying to use the audience's "gut feeling" to make his moral argument seem more than a simple argument by assertion, he also tries to paint his opponent as a bumbling moron while he's the supposed academic scholar. In his debate with Peter Millican, a philosopher at Oxford University, Craig said (beginning at the 1:18:00 mark) that the "number zero probably does not exist". Lets remove all the guests except the ones present in the first 50 rooms. Even if the KCA was sound, why would the cause itself not be natural? That statement is arguable because different cultures have often different moral values, so moral values are relative. This of course ignores that a royal line of succession necessarily requires the prior existence of a monarchy, just like Craig's inductive examples of things "beginning to exist"[18] necessarily requires the prior existence of the universe. Clear rating. Amazon Music Stream millions of songs: Amazon Advertising Find, attract, and engage customers: Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon: 6pm Score deals on fashion brands [59], Craig has stated that young Earth creationism is an embarrassment[60] and that Christianity is compatible with evolution,[61] much to the chagrin of fundies. the transcendental argument for God or TAG) argument used by the likes of Sye Ten Bruggencate. Modern theology, and especially such fundamentalist varieties as Craig's, cannot escape the dogmas of the cruel theology of the ancient times. external to humanity and the natural world (being located in God and metaphysics), but also arbitrary because anything that God commands apparently becomes morally okay. I'd like to talk just briefly about matters concerning apologetics and campus evangelism. Get Dr. Craig's newsletter and keep up with RF news and events. So what can we do when we have such ailments that God does not miraculously remove? Craig is a big fan of straw manning opponents and likes to respond to them with an undertone of humour, thereby lessening the credibility of both. Christian author and apologist William Lane Craig is doing better after dealing with a significant health scare regarding COVID-19 that required him to be hospitalized. William Lane Craig is Visiting Scholar of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology and Professor of Philosophy at Houston Baptist University. So I dont think that we need to condemn these confessions as heretical even if we disagree with them on certain areas as I do. At age 16, while a junior in high school, he first heard the message of the Christian gospel and yielded his life to Christ. (3 of 8). For example, it would be true perhaps that if you were to eat at Longhorn Steakhouse this noon you would order a mushroom hamburger. William Lane Craig is a Research Professor of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology in La Mirada, California. DR. CRAIG: I think that is too strong to call them heretical sects, so I would agree with him about his characterization of me. Scholarly Consensus for the Resurrection? Its been rightly said that when we pray about a plumbing problem, then God sends us a plumber. In speaking in Australia and other places, I have had Coptic priests come up to me with their long, black robes and thick beards with people from their congregations saying how much the Lord is using our material in the Coptic church to encourage believers in Egypt and elsewhere. We don't know what the universe was like before the first 1043 seconds after cosmic inflation started and, contrary to Craig's assertions, it is far from certain that the universe had a beginning. The History of Science and Religion in the Western Tradition, The Virtual Office of Dr. William Lane Craig. In any case, the chance outcomes one finds there are absurdly less than any of the so-called finely tuned probabilities that Craig cites, and yet, no one in authority appeals to "god" to explain such nearly infinitesimal outcomes. Where classic orthodox trinitarianism relies on the idea that natures, or . But nevertheless his approach should be considerably more philosophically informed than the systematic theologies that have been written by people who dont have philosophical training. Craig not only rejects Young Earth Creationism but has shown disdain for those who defend it. Here are some key points: Please bear in mind that Craig is not some cruel dogmatic wingnut. About the one thing that we do know about a singularity like the Big Bang, however, is that nothing from before the Big Bang could have affected anything that came after it. Atonement and the Death of Christ: An Exegetical, Historical, and William Lane Craig was born and brought up in Peoria, Illinois, to father Doris Craig and mother, Mallory Craig. the audience already has Craig's rebuttals in their mind, and hence they cannot truly analyze them objectively. William Lane Craig was born on August 23, 1949, in Peoria, Illinois. Any argument for the historicity of some past event always begins with the source material, and Craig's insistence that an examination of the source material is beyond the scope of a debate on the historicity of Jesus' resurrection is simply evasion amounting to methodological special pleading. Pantheism, in its belief that god simply is the universe, does not necessarily impute sentience to god, making it a notable exception. Furthermore, Occam's razor comes into play (as it always does when people try to multiplicate unnecessary hypotheses), reminding us that even if we entertain the conclusion that the cosmos was created by a god, it still doesn't explain where that god came from who designed the designer? 3. A singularity is a point where our predictive theories stop working and our math and physics breaks down on top of us lacking empirical data about the singularity itself. Last night Dr. Craig was admitted to Northside Hospital with COVID-19. W illiam Lane Craig was last month's story, but I am still puzzled by one of the attacks on him. Following the links bellow will take you to each response. If the universe seems to be fine-tuned or seems to be designed with human beings in mind, in no way does such seeming design or seeming fine-tuning necessarily imply the existence of a fine tuner or designer. I would rather leave an empty chair than share a platform with him, On The Possible God Of Philosophy And Cosmology Vs. Indeed, this lack of detail in his initial arguments allows him to present qualifications for them after his opponents have presented counterarguments. However, contrary to the Craigs claim, his other arguments are neither cumulative, nor do they fare much better under scrutiny than the KCA. KEVIN HARRIS: This is from the Pulpit & Pen blog by Seth Dunn, a Baptist organization for the most part. It's also worth pointing out that Craig's omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent God would not have needed to "fine-tune" anything; hence, any argument for fine-tuning rests upon naturalistic presuppositions and not theistic ones. He's a respected philosopher, yes. William Lane Craig vs Shelly Kagan Debate. This, despite the way our primitive ape brains struggle to grasp the implications of that. I think the Reformed perspective safeguards divine sovereignty only by sacrificing human freedom. Youtube Takes Out the Cosmological Argument! Craig is a proponent of mere Christianity. This has the following effects: Craig loves to switch back and forth between arguing for a god and God. It would thus appear entirely contradictory to claim that the Big Bang was in fact caused by anything that preceded the singularity and since even the laws of cause and effect that we observe in our universe today had broken down at the point of the singularity, it's not even a plausible premise to conclude that the principles of cause and effect must have operated, never mind existed, before the Big Bang. This usually takes the form of "My opponent's arguments have already been replied to by XYZ famous writer, hence I will just make a statement that it is invalid, without actually telling you what that rebuttal is." Real-time trigger alerts. Consider the following equation: 2x + 3y = 16. William Lane Craig - RationalWiki In 1982, Craig participated in a debate against philosopher Kai Nielsen on the topic of the Existence of God at the University of Calgary, Canada. Among the more ludicrous examples was the claim that Craig has defended his "The universe began to exist" premise in his Kalm Cosmological Argument "scientifically",[108] because: See? This is obviously true as almost 100% of the known universe would instantly kill us were we to be beamed up to it tomorrow. That the existence of an uncaused cause (i.e., God) contradicts the initial premise of his argument doesn't seem to dampen his spirits. However, we learn our morals from our friends and relatives. While he incorrectly cites the BGV theorem as supporting an "absolute beginning" to the Universe, Craig rejects Cantor's theorem, a mathematical proof that relies upon no physical presuppositions about the Cosmos, which is the case with the BGV theorem, which assumes a 4-dimension Lorentzian metric on a pseudo-Riemannian manifold where superluminal information exchange ("faster than light" communication) is a physical impossibility, hence, the past incompleteness of certain geodesics in inflationary models of the Universe. Michael Nugent, fief of Atheist Ireland, underscores the absurdity of Craig's argument (in his debate with Craig) by offering the following syllogism:[24]. Understand that Gods strength may be exhibited through your weakness. Craig is basically coupling Paleys old obvious design argument with the kind of presuppositionalist "I'm right by definition" (a.k.a. Valuable research and technology reports The next time youre tempted to feel sorry for yourself, think of all those worse off than you. William Lane Craig, a Christian philosophy professor at Houston Baptist University and Biola University's Talbot School of Theology, published the book "In Quest of the Historical Adam: A. William Lane Craig, Professor of Theology at Talbot, argues that many people think it's a way of knowing someth. Providing that the Abrahamic god exists and is sentient, of course. Since very few serious academics[note 18] bother with Craig's nonsense outside his debate circus,[note 19] while Craig can still get his "stealth apologetics" published by "reliable third parties",[note 20] Craig's fans can cite all of this wonderful material. An entertaining and instructive exchange unfolds between William Lane Craig and Ken Ham, the leader of Answers in Genesis. Real-time trigger alerts.